Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Interactive map of unemployment in CA
Map of unemployment in California
Monday, March 16, 2009
Recovery & reinvestment for dummies
Recovery and Reinvestment 102
Friday, March 13, 2009
Op-Ed in The Nation proposes a good jobs strategy
Rebuilding A Good Jobs Economy
Monday, February 23, 2009
People of color are struggling in the down economy
Minorities struggle in labor market
Some interesting figures:
$535: The usual median weekly earnings of Hispanic workers in the fourth quarter of 2008 (in 2008 dollars)—$207.20 less than white workers’ usual median weekly earnings during the same period.
$593: The usual median weekly earnings of African American workers in the fourth quarter of 2008 (in 2008 dollars)—$148.57 less than white workers’ usual median weekly earnings during the same period.
$748: The usual median weekly earnings of white workers in the fourth quarter of 2008 (in 2008 dollars).
Sunday, February 22, 2009
More than 2M get public aid in LA County
20% in L.A. County get aid
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
LA Apollo mentioned on colorlines
LA Apollo on RaceWire
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
The benefits of unions
The power of unions
Friday, February 29, 2008
House passes energy tax bill
The house is trying to shift tax breaks from oil and gas companies to renewables....
House of Representatives voted 236-182 to pass an energy tax bill that would shift nearly $18 billion in tax breaks away from oil and gas companies to renewable energy. The President has stated that he would veto the bill (H.R. 5351) if passed by the Senate. Congress attempted to include a very similar set of tax provisions in last year's law improving fuel efficiency standards, but failed -- by just one vote -- to obtain the sixty votes needed to defeat a filibuster and keep the tax provisions in the law. This year that vote could go very differently, as Democrats may use the budget reconciliation process for an energy tax bill. Under this process, the budget resolution could spell out some fiscal goal and then Congress could later pass a bill meeting that goal with just a simple majority of votes in the Senate instead of the usual 60 needed to overcome a filibuster.
If passed by both chambers of Congress, this maneuver would set up a very public fight with the White House over whether tax breaks should be targeted toward big oil and gas companies or renewable energy.
H.R. 5351 would extend and modify the "section 45 credit" for energy from renewable sources like wind, geothermal and hydropower, at a cost of $6.6 billion over ten years. Other provisions costing over a billion dollars each include a $4,000 credit for hybrid vehicles that can be plugged into an electric socket for recharging, bonds for state and local conservation programs, the extension and modification of a $300 credit for energy efficiency improvements in homes, and bonds for infrastructure in and around the World Trade Center. Several other provisions would promote the production and use of renewable fuels and other goals.
The costs of these initiatives would be offset by provisions that reduce or eliminate tax breaks for oil and gas companies. The largest of these provisions would raise $13.6 billion over ten years by barring large oil and gas companies from using the deduction for domestic manufacturing (often called the Section 199 deduction) and limiting the deduction for smaller oil and gas companies.
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Grist tries to break down "Green Job Economy"
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/2/19/155825/434?source=biz
Friday, February 22, 2008
Debunking Right wing notions of energy and business
"Over the years, we've seen a sophisticated right wing propaganda machine, funded by rightwing corporate and other sources, often dominate state policy debates with junk science and politically twisted information. The Progressive States Network is launching this new, expanded monthly version of the Eye on the Right to not only expose the workings of the Right but to also provide a detailed, factual response for legislators and advocates.
The first edition looks at the American Legislative Exchange Council's (ALEC's) Energy, Environment and Economics policy document and point by point exposes the distortions and unravels their arguments with facts and clear analysis. ALEC has long spearheaded to rightwing agenda in the states, advancing a rightwing corporate agenda under the guise of public policy reform."
http://progressivestates.org/files/eyeontheright/ALECandEnergy/ALECsplashpage.html
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
EJ networks come out against carbon trading (cap and trade)
National Apollo Alliance is considering getting into the mix to advocate for carbon trading credits to fund renewables, however our EJ allies are against carbon trading altogether...
On Tuesday, February 19, 2008, Environmental Justice (EJ) advocates gathered at 5 locations across California for a 10 a.m. teleconference to discuss the release of The California Environmental Justice Movement's Declaration Against Use of Carbon Trading Schemes to Address Climate Change. The Declaration details the environmental justice community’s opposition to the use of carbon trading and offsets because of their failure to achieve actual emissions reductions, the irreconcilable problems with trading experiments and offset use, and because of their inability to cause a timely fundamental change in the way we make and use energy. Rather, EJ advocates are calling for policies that focus on moving the state away from the fossil fuel infrastructure because such fuels are the overwhelming contributor to climate change and have devastating impacts on poor, low-income and communities of color in California and around the world. The coalition supports use of consistent carbon pricing mechanisms such as a carbon fee.
To find out more, go to their media page for more info on cap and trade
State Legislative Analyst says Gov's budget is "flawed"
In January, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger pegged the size of the budget shortfall at $14.5 billion for the 2008-09 fiscal year, which begins July 1.
Despite recent moves to sell bonds, delay payments and adopt cuts in education and health care, Legislative Analyst Elizabeth Hill said the state's budget continues to deteriorate. In essence, California's economy continues to bring in fewer tax dollars than anticipated.
In a critical look at Schwarzenegger's spending proposal, Hill called his administration's budget-balancing approach "flawed" because it fails to prioritize state programs.
"We recommend the Legislature reject the administration's across-the-board (cutting) approach," the report said.
The report lays out an alternative budget that proposes to eliminate nonessential state programs, shift programs to local control and reduce school funding by less than the $4.3 billion the governor suggested. It also recommends closing tax loopholes to add revenue in a "reasonable manner."
http://www.sacbee.com/102/story/726092.html
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Who's Greener? Obama v Clinton
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/2/4/23617/54464?source=weekly
Also has Obama & Clinton's green agendas...
Based on the writer, it comes down to these questions:
"Who will be more effective at getting a green agenda past the many obstacles it faces?
Who will do more to help downticket races and usher more Democrats into Congress?
There's been a lot of chatter about "theories of change" this election, but if you ask me, personal style matters a hell of a lot less than the number of reliable votes in Congress. So who'll get more downticket Dems elected? I think, as his recent endorsement by a string of red-state Dems attests, Obama will. He's got broader appeal with the Independents and wavering Republicans that will make the difference in close Congressional races.
So in the end, if I was forced at gunpoint to pick the greener Dem this election, it would be Obama, but only based on second-order effects, and only barely. By far the larger story this season is that both Democratic choices are advancing a green agenda substantially more ambitious than what was proposed by Kerry, Gore, or Clinton. It's hard for green Democrats to go wrong this year."
Bush signs econ stimulus plan MINUS green incentives
President Bush signed an economic stimulus bill last week, meaning you may have a check winging your way after tax time. Not included in the bill: clean-energy incentives and green-job boosting, which were dropped from the Senate version after narrowly failing to get enough votes. Undeterred, Democrats in the House of Representatives have introduced legislation to extend said incentives, providing tax breaks for investments in energy efficiency and solar, wind, and geothermal power at an expected cost of $17.5 billion over 10 years. It would be financed mostly by repealing some $13.6 billion in tax breaks currently enjoyed by crazy-rich oil and gas companies. The legislation passed committee last week, and may be taken up by the full chamber this week. There's reason to hustle: Some current clean-energy incentives will expire at the end of this year if they're not renewed.
Governor orders state hiring freeze
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed an today executive order freezing state hiring and halting nonessential service contracts -- a move he said could save the cash-strapped state $100 million by June 30.